Before
delivering birth Invite the Number Invitor 5 Year 1986 About Civil service
arbitration tribunal, people of opinion that after the opesional Civil service
arbitration tribunal, hence all dispute Arrange the Effort State
Decision Arrange the Effort State
[is] a[n stipulating written [released] by Body or Functionary Arrange the
Effort containing State [of] action [of] administrative law which is pursuant
to regulation of perundang invitation going into effect, having the character
of konkrit, individual and final, generating legal consequences to someone or
legal body civil ( Section 1 number 3 Invitor Invite the Number 5 Year 1986).
If measured [by] according to
addressee, hence norm punish that can be addressed to orang-perorang which is
not certain ( having the character of public) or addressed to certain people or
people ago make the norm punish that have the character of individually. While
if measured from things arranged, hence its law norm can have the character of
the abstraction ( if that arranged [by] things which is not certain) and have
the character of the konkrit [of] if things arranged [by] have certain. If
[both/ second] kinds of that measuring instrument [is] applied, hence can be
formulated [by] four catagori of[is nature of norm punish, that is:
a.
umum-abstrak
b.
umum-konkrit
c.
individual-abstrak
d.
individual-konkrit..
Of so much many
kinds of Decision Arrange the Effort above mentioned State in the reality only
Decision Arrange the Effort State having the character of just
individual-conkrit as execution [of] government competent able to be disputed
[in] Civil Service Arbitration Tribunal. Form The Decision Arrange the Effort
State which [do] not have the character of the individual-konkrit represent the
execution [of] government competent which is if disputed will enter in interest
of Appellate Court or Body [of] General Court [of] pursuant to Regulation of
Perundang Invitation going into effect.
Section 2 Invite the Number Invitor 5
Year 1986 about Civil service arbitration tribunal as have been altered with
the Invitor Invite the Number 9 Year 2004 determining as follows :
" [Do]
not the included in Decision congeniality Arrange the Effort State [of]
according to Invitor Invite this:
a.
Decision Arrange the Effort State
b.
Decision Arrange the Effort State
c.
Decision Arrange the Effort State
d.
Decision Arrange the Effort State
e.
Decision Arrange the Effort State
f.
Decision Arrange the Effort State
g.
Decision of Commission [of]
General Election [of] either in center and also [in] area [regarding/ hit]
result of general election".
To The Number Of Decision Arrange
the Effort State
able to be [released] by Body or Functionary Arrange the Effort State
To The Number Of Decision Arrange
the Effort State
able to be [released] by Body or Functionary Arrange the Effort State
Research punish this represent the
research punish the normative starting from Invitor Invite the Number 5 Year
1986 about Civil service arbitration tribunal as have been altered with the
Invitor Invite the Number 9 Year 2004 and with studying conceptual theoretical
idea framework, hence solution [of] case study in research punish this normatif
[is] expected will get the dispute clarity Arrange the Effort State becoming
absolute kompentensi [of] Civil service arbitration tribunal Body.
absolute determination Kompentensi
from a[n jurisdiction body [is] of vital importance its meaning [so that/ to
be] suing raised by plaintiff [do] not wrong address. mistake Or by mistake in
absolute determination kompentensi [of] jurisdiction body can cause fatal to
Plaintiff [of] because suing will be expressed inacceptable. In case Arrange
the Effort State [of] if suing raised to jurisdiction body which unqualified,
beside Plaintiff will lose the expense, time, energy and mind also Plaintiff
earn the loss the right to bring a lawsuit to the court because statute bared.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar